New English Library paperback, reprinted December 1985 cover scan of my copy |
I first read this novel decades ago, as a teen who loved Stephen King and all things horror and, crucially, didn’t have children. I loved it back then, though I could see it was dark and enjoyed the film too but have resisted a re-read, especially since we had Dude. But now seemed a good time (the novel turned 35 last year, a new film version was released this year) and I’m so glad I did.
It’s difficult to state just how dark the book is. It’s bloody frightening in places (that ending!) and it hits a parent hard where it hurts (the exhumation scene is almost unbearable) but it’s also beautifully structured (lovingly setting up the family, the house, the location, with the novel starting months before the bad stuff) and overall a fantastic read. The characters are all vividly brought to life, the locations are well realised and everything is wonderfully realistic, even how rational characters embrace the supernatural. Not for the faint of heart - King himself said in interview the novel scared him - but it completely justifies your attention and if you’re a horror fan I can’t recommend it highly enough. Superb stuff.
New English Library paperback, rear cover, reprinted December 1985 cover scan of my copy |
“Everything,” he told the Paris Review, “in it - up to the point where the little boy is killed in the road - everything is true.” He researched modern burial practises and told himself he had to “go a little bit further”, before realising it was so “gruesome by the end of it” he didn’t even give a draft to his wife Tabitha to read. “When I finished I put it in the desk and just left it there. I worked on Christine, which I liked a lot better, and which was published before Pet Sematary.”
The novel became known as the book King thought too scary to publish (he refused to do interviews or publicity in support of it). According to Grady Hendrix however, this a lot of this refusal was down to it being “his final flipped bird to Doubleday”. When he signed to them, his contract enrolled him into an author investment plan which protected him from taxes by only paying out $50k a year. A victim of his own success, within ten years the fund had amassed $3m, which would take Doubleday 60 or more years to pay off. He asked for his funds to be released (since he’d already moved publisher by then) and they refused, wanting at least one more book from him. To fulfill this contractual obligation, he gave them Pet Sematary, saying in interview “It’s a terrible book - not in terms of the writing, but it just spirals down into darkness. It seems to be saying that nothing works and nothing is worth it, and I don’t really believe that.”
Even though he wanted nothing to do with it, Doubleday went to town with their promotion. The novel had a first printing of 500,000 copies (“actually only 335,000 copies”, according to Grady), backed by a major ad campaign and sold 657k hardbacks in its first year, becoming “his first mega-blockbuster”.
BCA hardcover edition, 1993 cover scan of my copy |
In 1997, a dramatisation of six half-hour episodes was broadcast on BBC Radio 4.
In a 2010 introduction for the novel, King called Pet Sematary the most frightening book he’s ever written. I’d have to agree with him on that.
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon. Big thanks for the useful info. CT Psychic Clairvoyant
ReplyDelete